Sunday, November 6, 2011

Two Wolves and A Sheep

"The Triumph of Representatives," William Hogarth, 1755
The Anglo-Saxon scholar Alcuin once wrote to Charlemagne, “And those people should not be listened to who keep saying the voice of the people is the voice of God, since the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness.” We of the 21st century can no doubt agree with Alcuin of the 8th. It’s a disturbing thing when the Mubaraks and Gadhafis of the world are unseated, mistreated or killed by the very people who brought them to power years ago. It would be shameful enough if it had been a single person who had offered himself in service to a master only to turn around and stab him in the back. But what are we to say when the instigator of this madness is an entire people? It makes the theorists’ claim that the people are a safer repository for liberty than the prince look specious at best.

One would have divine sanction for these macabre doubts, too. There is no religion in the world so opposed to the Tyranny of the 51% as Christianity. Chapter 23 of the Book of Exodus contains a prescient warning against such mob rule: “Do not follow the crowd in doing wrong. When you give testimony in a lawsuit, do not pervert justice by siding with the crowd….” The New Testament continues this theme vividly. Indeed, we Christians have the distinction of being the only religion who can claim God as a casualty of democratic vote. Though he was raised from the dead, this was the work of an autocrat.

My point is not that monarchy or oligarchy is better than good, old “demokratis,” which, as an ideal, has been there right along with us throughout all the summers of Western Civilization. No, I agree too much with Winston Churchill that “…democracy is the worst form of government - except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.” Christianity recognizes that all men are equal, that they are given rights by their Creator – and this is the foundation of democracy. But it's not the cornerstone. Intimate knowledge of our own sin is. Truly, the only thing that makes the voice of people the voice of God is when the people know they are the farthest things possible from God. When they can acknowledge that they are the silliest, most temperamental and dangerous beings in the universe, then democratic government just may work – fingers crossed.

This knowledge of our fallenness is the vital ingredient missing from democracy across the globe today. It’s why Athens and republican Rome fell thousands of years ago and the French and Bolshevik revolutions created Hell on earth. It’s why the media’s pet Arab revolutions never know what to do but tear themselves apart once Big Brother’s gone. It’s why Occupy Wall Street’s solution is far worse than the problem. We’re no longer democrats because we recognize that we can’t trust ourselves with power over other people. We’re democrats because we think that we deserve whatever anyone else has. The same rights, the same treatment and the same amount of money. Bertrand Russell was right: "Envy is the basis of democracy."

2 comments:

  1. 2 points: 1 There is no "deserving" in a mechanistic society. How can we have a deterministic view of our origins and still feel that we "deserve." I remember my poly sci prof years ago talking about the "genetic lottery." It is a great illustration of the darwinian world-view and if our souls could more than intellectually assent to such non-sense there would be no riots, people would by logic understand there are merely the outcome of there own causal-genetic predispositions whether they are under the rule of Machiavellians or Muslims. Clearly there are problems with this line of reasoning.

    2. I recently read an author who said we elect who we "deserve." I think more clearly stated is, we elect who we are; and probably in hopes we would do the right thing; but we end up doing very much like we would do... the wrong thing... the thing that looks like us.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think that that's the paradox of postmodern society - that we've degraded ourselves to being nothing more than the spawn of primeval ooze and yet we don't like the idea of having to accept the resulting determinism. Shopping around for beliefs doesn't work out so well. But I think that this inconsistency that's postmodernism's greatest attraction is also its Achilles' heel. By pointing it out and giving an alternative that embraces free will and dignity with consistency, I think the Gospel can make inroads.

    I agree with that. Governments reflect who we are. Sometimes the tea party (with whom I agree on most things) takes anti-statism to an extreme and displaces responsibility from the people to the state. Even if our government's becoming out of touch, it's only because we're letting it. It's not being hijacked by lobbyists or corporations, but by apathetic citizens.

    "Now more than ever before, the people are responsible for the character of their Congress. If that body be ignorant, reckless and corrupt, it is because the people tolerate ignorance, recklessness and corruption. If it be intelligent, brave and pure, it is because the people demand these high qualities to represent them in the national legislature.... If the next centennial does not find us a great nation ... it will be because those who represent the enterprise, the culture, and the morality of the nation do not aid in controlling the political forces."
    --James Garfield

    ReplyDelete